Gas, Tariffs, and the Emerging Black Cost-of-Living Crisis

Gas, Tariffs, and the EmergingBlack Cost-of-Living Crisis By Dedrick Asante-MuhammadPresident, Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Aggressive military and economic shifts by the Trump administration are increasing market uncertainty and reshaping the cost of living seen in tariffs, gas prices, and goods overall. And because of long-standing disparities in income, wealth, and labor market […] The post Gas, Tariffs, and the Emerging Black Cost-of-Living Crisis appeared first on Waymaker Journal.

Gas, Tariffs, and the Emerging Black Cost-of-Living Crisis
Halftone collage of a crowd behind the White House with a rising red line chart and green torn-paper bands

Gas, Tariffs, and the EmergingBlack Cost-of-Living Crisis

Aggressive military and economic shifts by the Trump administration are increasing market uncertainty and reshaping the cost of living seen in tariffs, gas prices, and goods overall. And because of long-standing disparities in income, wealth, and labor market positioning, Black households are more exposed to these shocks and less equipped to absorb them.

To understand the current moment, we have to move beyond inflation as a general phenomenon and examine its distribution. Who is paying more—and who has the least capacity to pay?

Start with energy. Gas prices remain one of the most visible and immediate drivers of household financial strain. The average U.S. household spends roughly 3.2% of its income on gasoline, but that share is 5.2% for African Americans. Black workers are less likely to work remotely and more likely to drive farther. When gas prices spike, as we have seen with the U.S. and Israel war against Iran, those spikes operate as a regressive cost increase—a functional tax on labor force participation that disproportionately affects African Americans.

Further, energy price shocks do not remain contained. Transportation costs are embedded across supply chains, raising prices for food, consumer goods, and services.

Tariffs compound these pressures. While often framed as tools to protect domestic industry, tariffs can often function as consumption taxes. When import costs rise, those increases are largely passed from companies and corporations through to consumers. The New York Federal Reserve estimated that 90% of 2025 tariffs fell on U.S. firms and consumers, not on foreign producers. That means higher prices for goods ranging from appliances to clothing and footwear to automobile and auto parts.

Recent trade volatility has created rapid shifts in pricing driven by policy changes and retaliatory actions. For businesses, this creates uncertainty. For households, it creates instability. Prices fluctuate, but rarely downward in a sustained way. The result is a ratcheting effect on the cost of living.

These dynamics would be challenging in any context. But they are particularly acute given the economic position of Black households. The median Black household income remains roughly $56,000, compared to approximately $88,000 for white households—a gap of more than one-third. More importantly, the median white household holds nearly seven times the wealth of the median Black household. That difference determines whether rising costs are absorbed through savings or through cuts to consumption.

The median Black household income remains roughly $56,000, compared to approximately $88,000 for white households

Without sufficient wealth buffers, Black households are more sensitive to price volatility. A spike in gas prices or food costs translates directly into reduced discretionary spending, delayed bill payments, or increased reliance on high-cost credit. This is not a marginal adjustment—it is a shift in financial stability.

The labor market adds another layer. Black unemployment consistently runs about twice the rate of white unemployment, even in strong economic periods. Black workers are also more concentrated in sectors that are sensitive to economic slowdowns, including retail, transportation, and service industries. When cost pressures combine with economic uncertainty, the result is often an earlier and sharper contraction in Black employment.

This is how a broader, seemingly race-neutral economic slowdown becomes a targeted detriment to African Americans. While aggregate indicators may suggest resilience, underlying disparities mean that some communities enter recession conditions sooner. Rising costs, coupled with labor market vulnerability, create the conditions for what we are increasingly seeing: localized economic contraction in Black communities even as national data remains mixed.

Cut-up collage of a one hundred dollar bill in green and cream

Taken together, rising energy costs, tariff-driven price increases, and structural inequality form a reinforcing system. Each factor amplifies the others. Higher transportation costs raise prices. Tariffs raise prices further. Limited income and wealth reduce the ability to respond. Labor market disparities increase exposure to downturns. The outcome is not just higher costs—it is reduced economic mobility for African Americans.

This is not simply a cyclical issue. It reflects the structure of how costs and risks are distributed in the economy. When policies raise prices—whether through global conflict, trade actions, or energy volatility—they do not affect all households equally. They interact with existing disparities to produce unequal outcomes.

The outcome is not just higher costs—it is reduced economic mobility for African Americans.

The current cost-of-living environment is not neutral. It is filtering through an unequal economic system and producing unequal outcomes. For Black communities, the issue is not simply higher prices—it is heightened exposure to those prices and limited capacity to absorb them.

Understanding that distinction is critical because, without it, policy responses will continue to address inflation in the aggregate while missing its most consequential effects on African Americans.

The post Gas, Tariffs, and the Emerging Black Cost-of-Living Crisis appeared first on Waymaker Journal.